From Hudson Review, Spring
1998, vol. 51, No.1, pp.65-78.
Ecology and Ecstasy on Interstate
80
by Harold Fromm
"Loth to believe what we so grieved to hear.
For
still we had hopes that pointed to the clouds,
We
questioned him again, and yet again;
But
every word that from the peasant's lips
Came in
reply, translated by our feelings,
Ended
in this,--that we had crossed the Alps."
Wordsworth: The
Prelude, VI, 586
On March 28th, 1996, I packed up the
car in preparation for a five thousand mile automobile trip to the Southwest
and California that would take me away from home for at least three weeks. The
plan was to visit Tucson, Los Angeles, Davis, and Reno to see a number of
friends and family members as well as to explore a few potential warm spots to
which I might move in order to escape once and for all the harshness of Chicagoland's winters. The drive would doubtless be
bittersweet, a lonely solo unavoidably retraversing
many places that my now dead wife, Gloria, and I had visited together--in our
unflagging happiness--sometime around 1985. The final stop would be Reno, where
a little book-signing party was to be sponsored by the University of Nevada's
English department to celebrate the publication of The Ecocriticism Reader,
the fruit of half a dozen years of rewarding editorial collaboration with Cheryll Glotfelty.
I packed up my still quite new,
rather spiffy, Saturn SL-2 with more than enough provisions and equipment for
meals in motel rooms, including a hot plate, cans of wholesome soups and chilis, coffee, oatmeal, low-fat cookies (and other
necessities of a health nut's diet), utensils, gifts, clothes for various
climates, and 24 compact disks loaded into two 12-disk magazines that could be
inserted into the compact disk changer that I considered an essential option in
the car's purchase. Some long and lonely days inevitably lay ahead.
The next morning I took off for
Springfield, Missouri; then Amarillo, Texas; Las Cruces, New Mexico; and on the
fourth day--after passing a moonscapish formation of
rocks and boulders in southeastern Arizona--I eyed with slight nervousness the
faint nimbus of orange sky that greeted my arrival at Tucson. My obsession with
ecology had begun in the early seventies when Gloria and I (deceived by the
benign direction of summer winds during househunting)
were ignorant enough to have bought a little farm in northwest Indiana,
captivatingly beautiful but also the most polluted place I have ever dwelled in
my life. In our disspiriting and futile effort to
contend with the physical and mental symptoms caused by apocalyptic quantities
of effluents from the steel mills of Gary, we quickly turned into
hyper-sensitized canaries, acquiring a new awareness of even the most miniscule
amounts of insalubrious air. Now, all my travels resembled the food tours of
decadent gourmets, although in my case the ingestions derived not from eager tastings of the sophisticated concoctions of four-star
restaurants but from involuntary inbreathings of
complex toxic bouquets, the particular particulates and waste products of
distinctive industrial outputs in cities and countrysides
all over North America and Europe.
Tucson's air turned out to be still
relatively salutary, although a far cry from its celebrated purity of
yesteryear. But it was better than Chicago's and infinitely better than
anything breathable around Los Angeles, so I felt Tucson offered a real
possibility for relocation. After a few rewarding days exploring landscape and
housing, I headed northwest on the I-10 to Phoenix, which proved a very
different kettle of fish. Halfway there, though nothing obvious was to be seen
around me, I began to experience a tightening up of the sinuses and
throat--what people call "flu-like" symptoms--as well as the familiar
signs of a pollution headache. (But in my years of experience the most toxic
air pollution has tended to be partially or totally invisible.) Once into
Phoenix, however, I began to feel well again under sunny blue skies. I now
could see that the northeast wind was blowing a vast dark orange plume of smog
to the south and west of the city, a plume whose outer edges I had probably
briefly traversed en route from Tucson. This plume, broadening rapidly into a
wider and wider triangle as it expanded from its source, accompanied me all the
way to Blythe at the California border, a distance of roughly 175 miles. As it
gradually dissipated into the California desert, I could begin to see, leaving
Blythe, what I took to be the outer edges of pollution from Los Angeles, still
about 225 miles to the west, extending welcoming arms to embrace me in a
chokehold. The smog became increasingly intense as I got to Palm Springs, a
polluted desert oasis, and as I approached Riverside, one of the most
notoriously smoggy areas in the United States, the entire valley from Los
Angeles eastward appeared enveloped in a cloud of toxins.
For a few days I settled with friends
in Fullerton, near Disneyland, the same friends who had told me on each
previous visit that in Fullerton they were "not bothered by smog," an
ambiguous report I never could fathom. Did it mean that Fullerton itself was
exempt from smog or that my friends recognized its presence but were never
personally "bothered" by it? Whatever they intended, my days there
were marked with virtually nonstop headaches and malaise, the skies were
orange, and one of the friends who claimed not to be bothered fell into drowsy
states several times a day that segued into brief catnaps. It struck me as more
than a funny coincidence that these naps corresponded perfectly with my worst
headaches and "flu-like" symptoms. And indeed, I myself had several
bouts of pretty irresistible drowsiness during the week I spent in the greater
Los Angeles area, even after some exceptionally good nights of sleep.
When my visit had ended, I headed
north on Interstate 5, the Santa Ana Freeway in Los Angeles, which soon crosses
the San Gabriel mountains and makes its way up the San Joaquin Valley, the
vegetable-growing capital of North America. The wind was from the south and the
plume from Los Angeles was dispersed into a blurring haze throughout the
valley, almost as far north as the imaginary line one could draw from Salinas
to Fresno, about 225 miles from L.A. I vividly recalled stopping for gas on an
earlier trip up this route with Gloria and my Fullerton friends, issuing my
customary complaints about the shockingly bad air, complaints which often rub
people the wrong way, impatient with what strikes them as sheer crackpotism--since they claim not to be
"bothered." Here, perhaps 75 miles north of Los Angeles, the gas
station attendant had completely surprised me by volunteering the information
to my party that this polluted mess in the middle of nowhere was Los Angeles
smog! I regarded him as a secret ally.
As I reached the Sacramento/Davis
area, about 90 miles east of San Francisco, the skies looked good and I felt
pretty okay. The winds were carrying Sacramento smog far to the north, beyond
my projected route, a sharp contrast with my experience several years earlier
when I flew to Sacramento from Chicago and was surprised to find the ground
completely obliterated by orange smog as the plane circled in for a landing, a
more representative picture, as I since have learned, of what happens to
smaller cities as they grow into large ones.
So there it was. I had already
covered about 3000 miles and as I traversed the great open spaces of our heroic
pioneering West, everywhere I looked were miles and miles of toxic air, the
fruits of expansionism and technology, fruits that, in my mind, were making
millions of people feel wretched every day (without their knowing why) and
contributing to long-term, often fatal, diseases which one day would suddenly
appear as if from nowhere to do them in. Electric power plants, oil refineries,
steel mills, millions of automobiles, dry-cleaning plants, suburban lawnmowers,
jet-skis, snowmobiles, sport-utility vehicles, copper smelters--you name it.
Meanwhile, trees that produce oxygen were being cut down to produce Big Macs,
methane gas from cattle, and pollution from animal wastes; water was being
fouled by paper mills and oil spills; fish killed by pesticide run-off--you
know the story: the nightmare of technology, the inheritance of the Industrial
Revolution. "Abundance makes me poor," as one of Ovid's wiseacres
would have it. To suppose technology is not among contemporary society's chief
critical problems would be to live in a fool's paradise, to be permanently out
to lunch.
After spending two days with my
friends in Davis I was concerned to leave early enough to arrive in Reno before
dark, perhaps a two-hour drive now that the speed limits have been raised to 70
or 75 mph. I said goodbye, hopped into the Saturn, turned on the compact disk
player--my salvation--and sped off into the not-yet sunset. Davis and Sacramento
are flat, flat, flat, but the Sierras' foothills were not far to seek and
within an hour I could see the road starting to climb. I was already feeling a
little inebriate, having just heard Beethoven's Fantasy for Piano, Chorus,
and Orchestra, that curious melange of styles and
themes that eventuated in the "Ode to Joy," rapturous when done by
the right conductor but a flop in less capable hands. My spirit was soaring as
the road reached higher and the air thinned out, the rich vegetation of the western
side of the Sierras took on the intense green of a late afternoon in mid-April,
and the curves were getting sharper. Like Dr. Johnson in his primitive
horse-drawn coach en route from London to Edinburgh, I felt there was nothing
more exciting than racing along a highway at top speed. Sweeping through woods
edged by sudden declivities with panoramic mountain views that a solo driver
dare not examine too minutely, I was a little surprised to hear the opening
orchestral chords and shouted "kyries" of
Beethoven's Missa Solemnis,
which for the moment I forgot I had loaded into the CD player's magazine. This
was the great performance by Bernstein and the New York Philharmonic, recorded
in 1960, certainly one of the best on records, issued first on LP's and now
(along with the aforementioned Fantasy ) digitally remastered on SONY
compact disks, more clearly audible than ever before. The Missa
Solemnis, one of the dozen or so most sublime
musical creations of Western culture, sounding even today grotesquely cacophonous
in its Dionysiac syncopated frenzy, requires--like
the symphonies of Bruckner--the most skillful of
conductors to hold it together, or else it can simply fall apart into a series
of disconnected and stumbling episodes. Caught in its mania, I was driving
faster and faster, struggling to negotiate the curves and forced over and over
again to slam on the brakes to avoid going off the edge. Monumental vistas were
unfolding, my excitement level kept rising, all my senses were being stimulated
at once. I was reaching 7000 feet, I had just passed the stunning sights of
Emigrant's Gap--when the most stupendous moments of the entire Missa commenced--the highspeed
fugue on "et vitam venturi"
in the Credo, insanely executed by Bernstein and his chorus about twice as fast
as the speed of my car, music that at mere ground level always left me in a
heap, a pulp, a burned-out shell of a person. Now, at high speed and high
altitude, I reached a pitch of excitement almost hysterical. I was traversing Donner pass, skirting Donner
Lake, trying to take in this incredible panorama of sights from the world and
sounds from the car, thinking inevitably of the tragically fated Donner party, half of whom perished right there over a
hundred years ago when California was little more than a string of Spanish
missions founded yet another hundred years earlier by Father Junipero Serra. The strain (to
borrow from Donne) on that "subtile knot"
that joins spirit and flesh reached the breaking point as the fugue drew to its
frenetic close, and I burst into tears of sensory overload while pressing down
on the brake-pedal to keep my car from swerving off the road. The slant of
light from the late afternoon sun was still painterly, coloring the
multi-layered geological cuts through which the roadway was passing and
sharpening the relief of trees against mountainsides, of roadcurves
against mountain passes.
It was at that precise ecstatic
moment I experienced my ecological epiphany. Though it didn't come from God,
John Muir's Sierran hosannas to what he called
divinity and what Shelley more aptly called "the intense inane" were
never far from my mind. It derived, rather transparently, from easily
identifiable components of some of the most major intuitions and experiences of
my reflective life, but now, like the treescape's
sun-illuminated relief, my ordinary horizontal thinking had been shot through
by a vertical bolt of lightning-insight, casting the mundane into the sublime
by making it possible to think a host of thoughts simultaneously.
And exactly what did the mountains
have to say?
Put somewhat baldly: "Everything
human is technology!" Perhaps one would prefer to say not everything,
but almost everything. The spiffy car I was driving, with its air bags and
antilock brakes. The compact disk player, the disk with the Missa,
the analog tapes from 1960, the recording process itself, the original
performance with all of the manufactured instruments and trained voices, the
system of producing and distributing the disks, Bernstein's jet-setting existence
and materialities, Beethoven's own life, his music
paper, his pens, his piano, the musical "logic" that enables
composition. As for his deafness, more advanced technology might have
alleviated it, changing everything. Then there was the roadway on which I was
driving, the incredible engineering feats that cut through the mountain passes,
and the geological layers thereby revealed (illuminatingly examined by John McPhee in Assembling California). The mountain views
were themselves the fruits of technology--of decisions where to put the road
and the angles of vision that resulted, of the appearance of the layered roadcuts and their contribution to the aesthetic
experience. Mostly everything about me and my life had a technological
connection as well: the clothes I wore, the computer I used every day, the
manufactured food I ate, my shaving equipment, electric toothbrush, my
wristwatch, the crowns in my teeth, my glasses, orthopedic shoes. Maybe Donna Haraway was right: we're already cyborgs,
half organism, half prostheses; half Nature, half technology. Surely the uplift
I felt at this landscape required a healthy body , good food, bourgeois
nurturing and education, modern equipment and appliances--all from
technologies. Indeed, that I had survived childhood to become a physically fit
adult after several potentially fatal diseases was due in large measure to the
biotechnologies of medicine. From the first stone tools of paleolithic
peoples to the latest modem access to the World Wide Web, from the poisoned
Roman populace who drank water in leaded cups to the irradiated corpses from
Chernobyl--the good and the bad of human life were mostly technology.
Technophobes may praise the Amish for their simplicity, but what distinguishes
the Amish derives not from eschewing technology but from fixation upon one of
its earlier stages. Why should any particular phase of technology--or of
evolution, for that matter--be thought of as more "natural" than any
other? Are animals bred by humans to pull wagons more "natural" than
machines designed to do the same thing? Without technology--the payoff from
opposable thumbs--human beings would never have been able to lift themselves
out of primal animal existence. Even the most nature-committed postmodern
adventurers are completely dependent on the latest inventions. Edward Abbey,
for all his chest-thumping bravado in Desert Solitaire, was not as
solitarily self-creating as he liked to make out. Floating down the Colorado
river in his inflatable raft stocked with tinned and dehydrated foods or
roughing it in Havasu with telephone-ordered
provisions mailed from the grocery store at Grand Canyon, he was as much a
child of technology as the bourgeois tourists he satirized in the recollections
of his ranger days at Arches National Park. Today's wall climbers and
backpackers would hardly exist without L.L. Bean, Gore-Tex, Rockport, water
purifiers, camping stoves--and their four-wheel-drive gas-guzzlers. The
sciences of ecology are themselves enabled by devices to measure pollutants in air
and water, pesticides in vegetables, radiation from failed power plants. The
air pollution in New York, Chicago, northwest Indiana, Phoenix, and Los Angeles
may have tainted my life with an ongoing malaise, but my epiphany on I-80 made
it plain that the bad and good were so inextricably tied together that to be
against technology was to be against human life itself. I thought of the
absurdity of Max Oelschlaeger's nostalgia for
hunter-gatherers in The Idea of Wilderness as the decadence of a
technologically pampered bourgeois philosophy professor. The war of the
well-feds against technology looked less like Ludditism
than like the religious and political cults of Jonestown, Waco, and Oklahoma
City.
Indeed, the "ecocentrism"
and "biocentrism" of the deep ecologists has an alarming resemblance
to the right wing power ploys of misanthropes like Phyllis Schlafly
and Pat Robertson. If the reactionary right can be said to fear and hate adult
consciousness and to love only what they can safely ventriloquize
and control without backtalk--namely God and fetuses, creatures that express
the fantasies of their ventriloquist-creators--then the deep-ecological left
can be said to constitute their mirror image, with the Unabomber their
basket-case Doppelgänger. If the religious
right spouts self-regarding, repressive, and maudlin essentialisms about the
will of God, about the real nature of men and women, sex, marriage, and
family life, the deep ecological left essentializes
transient stages of evolution and speaks of ecosystems, natural habitats,
wilderness, animals, and "nature" as though they were platonic ideas,
fixed for all time instead of evolving aspects of a universe without stasis, an
evolution no less "natural" after the Industrial Revolution than
before. In an evolutionary universe, things adapt or perish, so Nature is
anything survivable, not just the familiar species that happen to have
populated recent centuries or our own more recent childhoods to provide deep
ecologists with "eternal" platonic forms. Instead of mendacities
about "the will of God" and human normalities,
the deep ecologists have their own mendacities about "speaking for the
Other," for trees and wildlife and mountains, just one more disingenuous
stratagem of the will to power. Their counterpart to God's will is the notion
of "intrinsic value," which replaces the narcissistic humility of
religious extremists with denunciations of anthropocentrism for its
"instrumentalism," a relationship to the natural world--it is claimed--that
fails to recognize the intrinsic value of other species. "Intrinsic
value," however, is itself an instrumental oxymoron. Its purpose is to
foreclose conversation, like references to God, and to establish the
"innocence" (i.e., reverence for life) of biocentrists
vis-a-vis the selfish predatoriness
of anthropocentrists. But nobody is innocent. To
be alive is to be a murderer! Recycling is the Master Algorithm of the
universe. The only authentic biocentric act is
suicide, freeing up finite matter for the benefit of others. Everything is
instrumental except survival of oneself. Inasmuch as all value is conferred by
a reflective consciousness, nothing has intrinsic value except a
reflective consciousness reflecting upon its own incarnation. When Dave Foreman
tells us that grizzlies are more "important" than people or when
Phyllis Schlafly tells us that atomic bombs are the
gifts of a wise God (to keep down non-Western, non-WASP adults so North
American fetuses can be turned into religious conservatives) we learn nothing
about either intrinsic values or God's will, only the bad news we already knew:
that Foreman and Schlafly are misanthropic powermongers for whom "nature" and
"God" are not-so-secret agents of desire.
The master motive for human beings
was always human survival and its attendant human interests. Aldo Leopold's
Land Ethic and his role as a father figure of biocentrism were necessary and
heroic developments after the destructive technologies of World War II, when a
new awareness of suicidal human depredation (the result of short-sightedness
and ignorance about what makes for survival) was desperately needed. But fifty
years later, Leopold's biocentric commandments have
become pious clichés for undergraduate term papers and for political reappropriation by the bourgeois anti-bourgeois left.
Whereas Leopold could speak pioneeringly in the
war-shattered forties about "reappraising things unnatural, tame, and
confined in terms of things natural, wild, and free," in the late nineties
these words function merely as invidious political terms, however benign their
original intent--or as poetry. As ontological concepts, "natural,"
"wild," and "free" now seem almost meaningless, if not
preposterous. Today, biocentrism and "intrinsic value" can be seen
simply as other forms of human interests, as "anthropocentric" as the
rest, no more disinterested than acts performed "for the greater glory of
God." Even in the case of Leopold, biocentrism was offered as an
enhancement of human life (both practical and aesthetic), since human life
depends on a particular ecological mix that war and unbridled
capitalist/communist technology have threatened to destroy. From a human
perspective (and what other do we have?), the wilderness (a recent invention)
and grizzlies (a recent obsession) aren't being preserved "for their own
sake," but because certain people like them, need them, or regard them as
necessary for a better sort of human life. If "existing for their own
sake" were the real criterion of "intrinsic value," then
cockroaches and cancer would be as entitled to exist as anything else. If
wolves can be reintroduced into Yellowstone ("for the ecosystem"),
why not smallpox into the Western world?
As I moved at high speed through the
wondrous Sierras while the sun declined in the late afternoon sky, my
electrifying sense of the primacy of technology--ever in need of control--and
the ineluctability of anthropocentrism--which does not always recognize its own
survival interests--was intensified by recollection of the passage from The
Prelude that I have quoted above. What so shocked Wordsworth and his party,
psyched up as they were by the notion of traversing mountains that had seemed
dauntingly majestic from a distance, was to learn that they had already crossed
the Alps! In Wordsworth such a realization inevitably leads to a passage
extolling the wonder and power of the human imagination, a faculty that half
creates what it beholds (and, one might add, that makes Nature in its own
image, just as it has always done with God). But I thought too of John Muir's
seemingly ecocentric hosannas in these very Sierras:
"every crystal, every flower a window opening into heaven, a mirror
reflecting the Creator," a passage (one among many) so different from
Wordsworth's yet finally as anthropocentric as his. Wordsworth's was an
unabashed celebration of human faculties even greater than the Alps; Muir's, an
erotic ecstasy that figured itself in the orgasmic language of hallelujahs--for
nothing is quite so human-centered as imagining a universe made for our delight
by a deity that has given his all.
My own epiphany was like
Wordsworth's, only more so. These wondrously beautiful "Sierras"
(which here can stand in for all of "nature") had no real existence
of their own. There may indeed be Sierras underlying my "Sierras,"
but as philosophers from Thales to Rorty have made apparent over two millennia, we know very
little about them and most of what we do know comes from the natural sciences.
We live in a world of perceptions and appearances and, for us, appearance is
reality. When I read his great book, My First Summer in the Sierra, I
could not help picturing Muir amidst the mountains as a dust mite stumbling
along inside a rich piece of velvet. Caught deep within the individual strands
of pile that make velvet look and feel smooth to a comparatively gigantic human
observer, the dust mite doubtless sings hosannas to the grandeur and mystery of
each rough and monumental peak, clearly the product of some sublime and
powerful deity. When human beings leave their "Scenic Vista"
highway-lookouts miles away from velvety mountainside forests and wander closer
in, to inspect the rugged mountain trees from inside, are they not like dust
mites in velvet, scrounging around in the undergrowth of giant conifers? And
when human beings behold the Sierras from a jumbo jet at 42,000 feet, are the
dune-like undulations seen from above any the less "real" than the
majestic peaks seen from below? And what do astronauts think, hundreds of miles
above the earth, the Sierras now flattened into a splotch of color? Why sing
paeans to majestic Sierras at all, any more than to strands of velvet pile, if
the majestic Sierran peaks are no more
"real" than (or just as "real" as) the flattened blotches
from outer space? Velvet pile is as awesome as Sierras if you happen to be a
dust mite. Sierras are as innocuous as velvet pile if you happen to be an
astronaut. Why privilege the ground-level perceptions of a particular species
(i.e., us) as representations of the real reality? We squash out
creations as sensational as Sierras with every step we take: not being small
enough to appreciate their microscopic majesty, we fail to sing songs of
reverence to mitochondria or particles of clay. Selective attributions of deity
are the very essence of anthropocentrism. Assessed from the totality of
possible viewpoints, everything would be equally sublime or mundane. Is the
world really a spectacular show designed for humanfolk,
staged by a cosmic Ted Turner, biggest cable operator in the universe, who
stays awake at night worrying about the fall of sparrows and other violence and
sex aired daily on his infinite channels?
"Nature," like everything
else a contested site (as they now say), is the technological production of our
bodies and minds, a supernatural naturalism. Whatever it may be in
itself, its "intrinsic value" is "manmade" for human ends
and its "beauty" a function of our sensory apparatus. Protecting
"nature" is in our own best interests, unless we are ecocentric enough to bequeath "our" world to the
next generation of mutants, perhaps irradiated survivors of Chernobyl (who
might thrive on pollution and nuclear wastes) or animals bizarrely transformed
by gene therapy run amok.
As I reached the eastern side of the
Sierras, everything changed. The lush green mountainsides had now become the
dry and sere landscape of the high desert. Off in the distance, like a New
Atlantis, glowed the highrise casinos of Reno,
suffused with an orange halo from the buildings' nighttime illumination
systems. Another feat of techno-magic.
I spent a few days in Reno and Sparks
with my friends, then moved on to Salt Lake City, whose Wasatch mountains
provide what is perhaps the most awesome stretch on all of I-80, though again
the placement of the city and the cut of the road contribute a very humanized
aspect to the spectacle, like a Turner painting. If the ill-fated Donner party could be said to have suffered from a lack
of technology, doomed as they were by slow locomotion, lack of electronic
communications, inadequate maps and weather information, low-tech food storage
and preservation, absence of railroads and cities, insufficient ways of keeping
warm, then my own near-catastrophic hour in a terrifying whiteout episode at
seven thousand feet in the Rockies outside Laramie was the result of advanced
technology that was not quite advanced enough. When violent winds began to blow
the snow from the mountaintops almost horizontally across the highway, the
marvelous roads became virtually invisible and treacherously icy; my high-tech
car was comfortable and warm in the twenty degree April air, but direly in need
of X-ray vision or radar. On the side of the road was a disabled juggernaut,
cross-country semitrailer, now overturned from
excessively daredevil driving. The other cars I could barely see despite their
generally ample lights. All the normally enabling technologies made it possible
for me to zoom into incredible danger with the insouciance and intrepidity that
technology so often breeds. (The failures of modern technology have been
cruelly charted by David Ehrenfeld in The
Arrogance of Humanism.) With parched mouth and pounding heart, I was nearly
rearended by another semitrailer
that barrelled out of the curtain of snow into my
rearview mirror as I crawled along at 25 mph., managing to swerve aside at the
last possible second. Then suddenly, as though turned off by a switch, the
whiteout lifted and I found myself in crisp bright sunlight. Next day,
approaching Lincoln, Nebraska, with winds again howling but sun shining brightly,
I was confronted by another sort of techno-misadventure, this time a blinding
dust storm that probably covered hundreds of square miles, the result of
recently plowed fields and drought-like conditions--fortunately not very
serious compared to the adventure of the day before. For me the prognosis was
plain: not a return to hunting and gathering--a never-never land of innocence
and stasis--but a more and more refined technology. Technology was a metaphor
for evolving human life, with consciousness as its blueprint. It was no more
reversible than consciousness itself.
After a night outside Omaha, I was
returned to bliss once more: as my estimable radio's scanner sampled every
AM/FM broadcast receivable along I-80 in Iowa, I soon discovered the excellent
station operated by Iowa State University, audible across most of the southern
part of the state. I decided to give the CD player, which had provided
exemplary service, a much-earned rest. It was late Saturday morning and the
Metropolitan Opera was about to broadcast Die Walküre,
conducted by James Levine, my favorite part of The Ring. With Bruno
Walter, Lotte Lehmann, and Lauritz Melchior necessarily
delivering a shadow performance deep inside my head and heart, I was moved
nonetheless by the power of Levine's introductory thunderstorm and I was
knocked quite flat by the heldentenor virtuosity of Plácido
Domingo as Siegmund. As I reached the Quad Cities
area and began the crossing of the Mighty Mississippi--with due regard for the
river-defining technologies of Mark Twain, T.S. Eliot, and the Army Corps of
Engineers--signs of spring were definitely in evidence, buds were opening, the
air was warming, and Sieglinde was singing the most
rapturous passage in all of The Ring: "Du
bist der Lenz/ nach dem ich
verlangte/in frostigen
Winters Frist." As tears of ecstasy again began
to flow from the easily unravelled strands of my subtile knot, like Molly Bloom saying "Yes" I
experienced a powerful moment of assent to a newfound identity: fighting
postmodernism all the way, I had nevertheless to acknowledge that I was indeed,
after all . . . a cyborg! Take away
technology, I realized, and I would cease to exist. From my daily traveler's
lunch of frozen yogurt spurted forth from machines at McDonald's to my Visa
card swiped through roadside gas pumps, I began to review the adventures of the
previous three weeks. And while I can't provide a summation as resoundingly
scriptural as Eliot's "What The Thunder Said," I think I can venture
a little homily called "What The Car Stereo Said."
To a greater or lesser degree, I
therefore affirm, everything human is technological. Everything human is
anthropocentric as well. "Ecocentric
Appreciation of Nature" may have a disinterested honorific air (like
"for the greater glory of God"), but if the "nature" that
we "appreciate," like Wordsworth's Alps, is largely produced by our
psycho-biological constitutions (Wordsworth called it "Imagination"),
then appreciation of nature (and everything else) is an essentially
anthropocentric subjectivity. Because, if we ceased to exist, the
"majestic Sierras" would cease along with us. Something,
presumably, would remain (e.g., the universe dealt with by the physical
sciences), but it would be neither peaks nor blobs, neither majestic nor
"serrated," all requiring a sensibility and a "point of
view." From the point of view of the universe (which has no point of
view), to name it is to misname it, because the act of naming makes it what it
is only for us. Without Nature, no humans; but without humans, no
"nature." If this is true, then what can it mean to be "ecocentric"? The motto of the journal Interdisciplinary
Studies in Literature and Environment (ISLE)
reads, "When humans study nature, it is nature studying itself." But
it might just as well read, "When humans study nature, it is humans
studying themselves."
As I pressed into Illinois, now only
a few hours from home, Act One was drawing to its close: Plácido
Domingo, in the guise of Siegmund, shouted his "Siegmund heiss' ich/und Siegmund bin ich!"--a feat of the most glorious vocal technology.
He pulled his sword out of the tree with that unbearably potent cry of "Nothung! Nothung!" leaving
multitudes of technologically equipped people all over the world gasping at
their stereos in Wagnerian delirium. Sieglinde, as my
libretto so finely puts it, "throws herself passionately on his
breast" while "he draws her to him with passionate fervor." To
worldwide gooseflesh, the orchestra played its wild and frenetic coda while the
lovers embraced. As the curtain fell at the Metropolitan and the audience went
berserk almost a thousand miles to the east, I thought of the way in which
everything suddenly falls into place at the end of To the Lighthouse
--and I felt that I too had had my vision.